Return to regular schedule

With this issue, Catholic Times returns to its regular bi-weekly schedule, after special coverage of the reception and installation of Bishop Thomas John Paprocki.

The next issue of Catholic Times will be July 18.

CNS News

3 Minute Roundup

Pope announces pontifical council for new evangelization
VATICAN CITY — Pope Benedict XVI announced he is establishing a pontifical council for new evangelization to find ways “to re-propose the perennial truth of the Gospel” in regions where secularism is smothering church practice.
Leading an evening prayer service June 28 at Rome’s Basilica of St. Paul Outside the Walls, Pope Benedict said there are areas of the globe that have been known as Christian for centuries, but where in the past few centuries “the process of secularization has produced a serious crisis” in people’s sense of what it means to be Christian and to belong to the church.
“I have decided to create a new organism, in the form of a pontifical council, with the principal task of promoting a renewed evangelization in the countries where the first proclamation of faith has already resounded and where there are churches of ancient foundation present, but which are living through a progressive secularization of society and a kind of ‘eclipse of the sense of God,’” he said.
The pope did not say what the formal name of the pontifical council would be and he did not announce who would head it, although in the weeks leading to the announcement, Vatican commentators suggested it would be Italian Archbishop Rino Fisichella, currently president of the Pontifical Academy for Life. (CNS)
 
High court won’t review case claiming Vatican liable for abuser
WASHINGTON — The U.S. Supreme Court has left standing a lower court ruling that will allow an Oregon man to try to hold the Vatican financially responsible for his sexual abuse by a priest, if he can persuade the court that the priest was an employee of the Vatican.
By declining to take Holy See v. John Doe, the court June 28 left intact the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruling that said because of the way Oregon law defines employment, the Vatican is not protected under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act from potential liability for the actions of a priest who Doe, the unidentified plaintiff, said sexually abused him in the 1960s. The case will now go back to U.S. District Court, where Doe’s attorneys will attempt to prove that the late Andrew Ronan, a former Servite priest who was laicized in 1966, was a Vatican employee at the time the events took place.
In order for the District Court to have ruled that the case could move forward, a lower standard of having adequately “pleaded” a connection between Ronan and the Vatican had to be met. Before the issue of liability of the Holy See can be addressed, Doe’s attorneys will have to persuade the court under a higher standard “proving” that Ronan was a Vatican employee. (CNS)
 
Sainthood cause opened for Brooklyn priest who fought bigotry
BROOKLYN, N.Y. ­— In the midst of a New York heat wave, a small parish in Brooklyn opened a new chapter in the diocese’s history. About 200 people gathered June 24 at St. Peter Claver Church for the formal opening of an inquiry into the cause of canonization of Msgr. Bernard J. Quinn, who spent his life advocating for African-American Catholics in the Diocese of Brooklyn.
Msgr. Quinn, who was born in 1888 and died in 1940, was founding pastor of the all-black St. Peter Claver Parish and founder of Little Flower Children Services to care for black orphans. Today, St. Peter Claver is one of three worship sites in St. Martin de Porres Parish in Brooklyn’s Bedford-Stuyvesant neighborhood.
After vespers on the feast of St. John the Baptist, Bishop Nicholas DiMarzio of Brooklyn spoke about his personal connection to Msgr. Quinn. A little more than a year ago, on his 65th birthday, the bishop underwent coronary bypass surgery. The doctors considered the surgery a success, he said, but a week later he found himself back in the hospital after fainting. He said blood clots in his lungs and heart threatened his life, and during the fervor that surrounded his second surgery, Msgr. Quinn came to his mind. He could not say why he thought of him or whether it was a miracle, but his prayers to him during that period have turned into a wellspring of devotion. (CNS)
 

Women today who talk about Mary and weep for joy

Written by Effie Caldarola
Sunday, 14 February 2010
Rate this item
(0 votes)

When our parish women’s spirituality group discussed Mary, the mother of Jesus, I was struck that most of the women who talked about their relationship with the mother of Jesus wept.

Tears are an indication of deep emotional involvement. Sometimes we Catholics over-intellectualize our faith. Catholic women don’t do that when they talk about Mary.

St. Ignatius of Loyola would be the first to tell us that in our tears we encounter God. So what did these tears tell me about how women often come to the Lord through Mary?

The Savior’s mother is indisputably one of history’s most famous figures. And yet we Catholics believe we can have a personal relationship with her. We women especially feel close to her in our own mothering.

For women of a certain age — and that includes me — there’s a history of evolution in our feelings about Mary. We grew up with her statue by our bedside. At my house, we said a rosary every night.

And then there was the whole apparition culture of my childhood. If we grew up Latino, we loved Our Lady of Guadalupe. To an Anglo, Fatima was the ticket. Now, if we haven’t been to Medjugorje, we are close to someone who has.

But apparitions are never meant to be a litmus test of our faith. A search for the deepest meaning takes us to Scripture — and to our tradition. And in both we find truth and questions about Mary.

Scripture actually tells us very little about the mother of Christ. So it’s easy to see why, when a deepening study of Scripture and the historical Christ became so important to Catholics in the last half of the 20th century, people became confused about Mary and uncomfortable with some Marion devotions that seemed not to represent the dark-haired Jewish girl that Mary was.

When you consider the political turmoil and uncertainty of the time during which Mary gave birth, it raises questions about Christ’s life, his brutal execution and his own mother’s views of her world.

During Christmas, I found myself praying the Magnificat (Lk 1:46-56) over and over, and thinking of the political climate of Mary’s life and times. The Magnificat is, of course, an echo of Hannah’s canticle in 1 Samuel 2:1-10.

I listen to Mary’s words: “He has ... dispersed the arrogant of mind and heart. He has thrown down the rulers from their thrones but lifted up the lowly. The hungry he has filled with good things; the rich he has sent away empty.”

Those are radical sentiments. Those are words of rebellion against the arrogant, the rulers, the rich. They fill me with admiration — and more questions — about this woman who after two millennia still beckons and intrigues.

My childhood image was of a meek, subservient woman. My adult image of Mary is of a woman at whose knee was raised a man who confronted power, who challenged every hypocrite, who welcomed every sinner.

Christ had her DNA, and in his heart he carried her every message.

It’s a testament to Mary that our devotion and fascination return in every generation and touch our hearts anew. After all, she herself predicted that, because of her son, “from now on will all ages call me blessed.”

Effie Caldarola

Effie Caldarola

Effie Caldarola of Anchorage, Alaska, is a syndicated columnist for CNS.

Add comment


Diocese of Springfield in Illinois